Monday, 16 November 2015

Lewisham voters hit with boundary changes and new voters rule that will help present Goverment cling to power


Electoral roll changes: More than 1 in 20 Lewisham people could lose their right to vote

by Darryl
Lewisham Council is trying to get people to sign up to the register
Last month, this website revealed that one in 50 Greenwich borough residents could lose their right to vote under changes to the electoral register being introduced in December.
Now it's emerged that more that the situation is worse in neighbouring Lewisham - with more than one in 20 voters set to fall off the register if they don't act before 1 December.
Previously, the electoral roll was compiled by one member of each household filling in a survey form. Now, everybody who wants a vote has to apply individually.
Figures released by Lewisham Council under the Freedom of Information Act show that out of 195,863 voters in the borough, 10,730 face falling off the roll when councils switch to the new system on 1 December.
As in Greenwich, it is less well-off areas of Lewisham borough that face losing the most voters. Evelyn ward, which covers most of Deptford, risks losing 8% of its voters; while New Cross ward is set to lose 7.5%.
Lewisham kindly supplied a breakdown of how many voters are registered in each of these 19 wards, so these figures are more detailed than those offered by Greenwich.
Ward
Missing voters
Evelyn (11,308 voters)
910 (8%)
New Cross (11,260)
852 (7.5%)
Lewisham Central (13,028)
842 (6.4%)
Rushey Green (9,766)
614 (6.3%)
Telegraph Hill (11,610)
697 (6%)
Brockley (12,518)
738 (5.9%)
Forest Hill (10,764)
631 (5.8%)
Perry Vale (11,264)
627 (5.5%)
Sydenham (11,129)
616 (5.5%)
Ladywell (10,060)
515 (5.1%)
Bellingham (10,308)
529 (5.1%)
Catford South (10,788)
549 (5.1%)
Whitefoot (9,913)
492 (4.9%)
Crofton Park (10,879)
494 (4.5%)
Downham (10,315)
450 (4.3%)
Grove Park (10,517)
442 (4.2%)
Blackheath (10,091)
393 (3.9%)
Lee Green (10,345)
339 (3.3%)
Total "red matches" - those due to come off electoral register in 1 December 2015, as at 11 November 2015. Ward electorates as at 1 September. Source: Lewisham Council
Lewisham staff have been working to make sure people stay on the roll, and these efforts are highlighted in the council's figures - 1,410 people have been put on the roll since 1 September.
While it's true the change may also weed out names that shouldn't be on the register - because they are dead, or are registered in two different places - the Labour Party has launched a "missing million" campaign to get people back on the electoral roll.
This isn't just out of public service - proposals to cut the number of parliamentary constituencies from 650 to 600, which are set to particularly affect Labour's urban heartlands, are likely to use 1 December 2015 as a reference date.
Seats in Greenwich and Lewisham are particularly under threat from the changes, which are likely to see many more seats span borough boundaries.
Lewisham Deptford, currently held by Vicky Foxcroft, is set to lose 6.2% of voters. Past plans to redraw constituencies first saw the Deptford area merged with Greenwich, before it was then joined with Rotherhithe.
Think you're not on the electoral roll? Check with electoral offices in Lewisham, Greenwich, or anywhere else. Know you're not on the roll? Register now.
PS. The Freedom of Information Act, which uncovered these figures in both Greenwich and Lewisham, is under threat. See four simple ways you can take action.
Darryl | 15 November, 2015 at 10:24 pm | Tags: election 2016, electoral register, lewisham council | Categories: lewisham council, local stuff | URL: http://wp.me/plVfU-5Jw

Sunday, 8 November 2015

Ray Woolford and Pippa Jones Talk Radio launch best Current affairs programme on the planet

Goverment NHS policy is likely to see more and more Doctors and Nurses Jailed, whilst in Paris at end of November the largest climate change conference will take place with biggest street protests across the globe, thanks to the succes of my book " Food Bank Britain " which i trust you have all bought a copy in solidarity has lead to me given a job as a Co host on a Talk radio main stream media , which allows me to talk about the issues i care about and address the crap that is pumpet our as news through our National media networks, i need you guys to blog. tweet. face book and at very least listern to my show with pippa , send in your ideas and campaigns that you are looking to raise awareness and use this The Best Current affairs show in the world to engage and win our struggles.12-1 UK time first friday in every month. You can click on the following talk radio link and hear the first show which is 1 hour long and tell your fellow activists and friends that we have a media show that supports OUR politics not the 1% .
Pippa Jones Radio (@RadioJonesPippa)

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Austerity. New radio show launches 6 November . Tune in.

New Radio Show launching this Friday 6 November and then 12-1 UK time first Friday every month. This is a totally new style current affairs show that will talk about the issues being ignored by the main stream media and talk and explain it, such as Ttip in a way people can understand, whilst also explaining what is the real political agenda? and this week we talk Paul Mason and postcapatalism, the huge climate change event in Paris. The student and Doctors protests and this evenings ‪#‎millionmaskmarch‬ It will allso give voice to all groups and campaigns across the EU were we share common aims and share same passion . Please tunn in , click on the link, put the link on your blog, twitter. face book page etc , send me and Pippa details of campaigns and events and we will do our best to give you a voice. this is the first time Our issues are getting main stream radio air time, not just as brief mention, but we get an entire hour. Use the platform to get the issues you care about main stream from your point of view..
Pippa Jones Radio (@RadioJonesPippa)
05/11/2015, 10:49
@tretalkisgood Friday 12pm GMT w @Raywoolford talking ‪#‎climate‬ ‪#‎juniordoctors‬ #MillionMaskMarch click on talkradioeurope.net/listen/listen-…
talkradioeurope.net

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

crises at Christmas, Can you donate a mug of tea to person in food crises ?


Ray woolford (@Raywoolford)
Can you afford 2 donate a mug of tea to a neighbour , friend , family member in crises this Christmas ? pic.twitter.com/jq08ampQEE

Lewisham Council plan to bulldoze Community centres and close more librarys.



Hello all,
As usual please feel free to circulate the following to everyone.
****  Reminder:  Have you all e-mailed/written to the Mayor, your local councillors, MP, the Press?  The numbers game is really important.

Panel:  Director of Community Services, Aileen Buckton; Cabinet member for Community Services, Cllr Best; Head of Library and Information Service, Antonio Rizzo.

The same presentation concerning budgetary shortfalls was made again.  There was an admission that the Lewisham voluntary sector was being approached (soft marketing), being asked ".. in theory, are you interested ...?"  As well as the main consultation meetings other smaller meetings will be held, Focus Groups.  Included will be the young Mayor's office, schools, outreach organisations, Pensioners' Forum.  Library Staff will be consulted.  It was an exceptionally well-attended meeting, over 60, but that may be as the information has circulated and more people know.  The questioning was underpinned by sound knowledge of what was going on and disbelieving the fundamentals of what they were being told.
Again Ms. Buckton repeated that the consultation information had been trailed in the Autumn Lewisham Life.  It was not.

Questioning focussed on what the offer was.  Volunteers will be trained.  This raises further questions of costs, the turnover, constant recruitment, volunteers who cannot always appear.  There will be the usual security checks.  But, we do not know if the Council  expects volunteers to be the answer as we have been told future "community" libraries will not operate as the current "community" libraries operate.  Reports back from these libraries refer to not opening on time and non-opening, due to lack of volunteers.  The council was warned the chosen model in 2010/11 would not work, and it has not.  How can we be sure they are choosing the right option now?
The organisations chosen to run the 3 buildings (Manor House, Torridon Road, Forest Hill) in future will be non-profit and likely to run services complementary to a library service, with special connections to the local area of each library.  They could be connected to Education, Community organisations, Arts organisations.  There was a great deal of detail from Ms. Buckton concerning families, mothers, children at Torridon Road, until muttering revealed other users e.g. the elderly, teens, the middle-aged .....
We are an intelligent, informed, thoughtful bunch, when we try, so others asked why we were at a talking shop, being faced with a fait accompli so our views and opinions were irrelevant to the process?  What if all views were against the chosen option?
How could we ensure the new management would reflect diversity needs?  Diversity needs must be met.
How long would the contracts last?  The length of contracts would rely on the nature of the building and what group wants to take it on.  The council will have the final say and, it is just laughable to have to type the following, local people will be involved!  There will be no capital investment in the building (no, the tax-payer has already footed that bill.)
And here is the quote of the evening, the panel, on being told it was all pointless gave Cllr Best an opportunity to state that the status quo cannot continue.
There, you have it!
The value of professional staff in libraries was felt to be key to improving literacy, as well as being of great value to the rest of us so how would a reduced staff run 3 hub libraries for 85 hours per week, each?  Plus, enough staff for peripatetic visits to 9 "community" libraries, not sure if that includes Catford (unstaffed), which could become a zombie library and the best take away in town.  In addition they will still service commitments to schools, doctors' surgeries etc.  Meanwhile, they will be travelling back and forth across the borough, by bus, walking (running?), driving, using up time, not usable in libraries.  Don't even mention the traffic congestion and expenses.  Mr. Rizzo then played his master card - staff would be promoting opportunities, engaging in promoting all library services.  This presupposes you are not going to be able to distinguish between what you had and what you will get.
Our natural cynic in the audience could only conclude that outsourcing to the voluntary sector was meant to make everything look OK.
More detail revealed that the contracted voluntary organisations would meet the overheads of the buildings, but there was equivocation about maintenance.  Depending on what that would require could mean that the council would have to step in with funding.  Questions on how this new model would work were not answered clearly enough, if at all, for any of us to be sure what would happen.
Further points were raised over the non-working of self-issue/return machines, the collapse in borrowing figures for the "community" libraries and who would have caretaking/security responsibilities.  Points were raised, but not answered.
A key question was why the council could not organise least harm for the money available.  Lewisham is a recognised deprived borough so would it not be optional to use some of the reserves?  As we have seen with "community" libraries if the council's decision/policy back fires who picks up the pieces?  Officers would have to face the consequences of their actions, as will the public.
Yet again statements were made that volunteers would not be running the library service.  There would be a time table of staff visits made to "community" libraries, but the solution for each library would be different and a focus for the neighbourhood.  The organisations chosen will take up the service as the council is not seeking to make a profit and will not take rent on a commercial basis.  They will come as funded organisations.
Therefore, the question was raised about how these organisations would be funded.  A staff member of a funded organisation pointed out how it was increasingly difficult to raise money from elected authorities, local councils, the Arts Council, grants organisations, private funding etc, as money is drying up elsewhere.  If this is policy huge numbers of organisations will be chasing the same pots of money!  Thus we have the right to be most concerned about the long term sustainability of what is chosen.  Not only do we not know, neither do the officers, who will make the recommendation to the Mayor and Cabinet.

regards to all,

Patricia Richardson


Ray Woolford new political commentator for Talk Radio Europe


Pippa Jones Radio (@RadioJonesPippa)
First Friday of every month politics/social issues with @Raywoolford email questions to pippa@talkradioeurope.com twitter.com/Raywoolford/st…