Southwark sends in the HeaviesNov 06, 2013 08:08 pm
Adrian Glasspool, the last resident of the Heygate estate was forcibly evicted from his home of 16 years. A team of bailiffs from Shergroup Ltd accompanied by police and officers from Southwark Council arrived at lunchtime, and after a short conversation Adrian left - with the help of the bailiffs. No notice of the impending eviction was issued to Adrian, his surveyor or solicitor.
Adrian’s home passed into Southwark’s ownership on Monday. On the same day Adrian, his surveyor and Southwark’s surveyor met to make a final valuation of the property. Southwark’s surveyor formally asked Adrian to leave that day. Adrian said that he would leave as soon as he received a call from his solicitor telling him that his compensation payment had been paid into his solicitor’s holding account.
Southwark made no payment and instead today it went ahead with a forced eviction. This evening it informed Adrian’s surveyor that payment will be made - after his eviction and less its £5,500 cost.
Brute force and ignoranceWhy did Southwark Council resort to physical force to remove Adrian? It clearly had the paperwork all ready to go, and was willing to authorise payment - after his eviction.
Southwark has behaved vindictively: Adrian and other leaseholders have fought long and hard to get a just amount for their homes. Homes they did not want to leave in an area where they can now no longer live. Unfortunately their battle was without success, but it was too much for Southwark who had to explain themselves at length at the CPO public inquiry in Feb 2013, when amongst many other embarrassing facts it was revealed that only 45 Heygate residents have been rehoused in new homes at the Elephant.
Leaseholders bewareThis must also be an alarming event for any leaseholder in Southwark who lies in the path of a regeneration scheme - and there are many, including 580 on the Aylesbury estate just down the road from the Heygate. Southwark Council have shown that they are not willing to either negotiate or compromise but will instead resort to the harshest methods to get their own way.
Southwark has broken every promise ever made to the residents of the Heygate whether they were leaseholders or tenants, and it seems fitting that the very last of the 3,000 forced out since 2007 should require the assistance of bailiffs. It is entirely consistent with the shabby treatment residents have received right from the beginning of this whole sorry excuse for a regeneration scheme.
Read in browser »
The end for the last Heygate residentsOct 27, 2013 10:01 pm
Southwark Council stole our homes and we are not going to forget it.The final two Heygate residents must leave the estate by 4th Nov. These will be the last of the 990 households still resident on the Heygate when the notorious Heygate Action Plan was put into effect in 2007. This plan decreed that everybody would be moved off the estate before the new homes they were promised would rehouse them were built.
Terry Redpath Former Heygate Leaseholder
The final residents have been told that if they are not gone by 4th Nov the bailiffs will be knocking at their doors. They are in a quandary however: The compensation they need to buy a new home will not be paid until after they have left.
A request to Southwark Council that the compensation be paid before they leave - which only seems reasonable - has been refused. On top of this, Southwark has threatened to reduce the compensation by the amount required to pay any bailiffs and associated legal costs.
In response to an enquiry as to what housing might be available should leaseholders have nowhere to go, Southwark first referred them to its emergency housing services, who then said that it had no legal obligation to provide temporary accommodation and suggested staying with friends and family.
It is worth remembering what was promised:
Leaseholders were originally offered a shared equity option on buying a new home in one of 16 replacement housing sites and the new-build Heygate homes. But despite reaching the point of being asked to choose what kind of layout they preferred for their new homes, the shared equity option never got written into the final agreements with the developers of the sites, and no leaseholders were able to move into any of the replacement housing sites or the new Heygate homes. When asked at the recent CPO public inquiry why leaseholders didn’t get the new homes that they had been promised, the council’s lead officer replied “I don’t know, I wasn’t employed by the council at the time the promises were made. But the new homes will be open for anybody to purchase and I am sure Lend Lease will be happy to sell to anybody.”:
Analysis of information received from FOI requests shows that the average compensation received by leaseholders as the council’s valuation of their homes is as follows:
- 1 Bed flat - £95,480
- 2 Bed flat - £107,230
- 3 Bed Maisonette - £156,833
- 4 Bed Maisonette - £177,421
In a recent interview with Property Week magazine, former Heygate leaseholder Terry Redpath said “We could no longer afford to stay in the area: the compensation we received plus £45,000 of life savings bought us a terraced property 15 miles out of London. I feel that we have been forced to give up our home to accommodate the building of homes for overseas investors.”
Redpath is a former Southwark housing officer who lived on the estate for 35 years, and whose family has lived in the area for generations. On average the compensation paid to leaseholders amounts to around a quarter of the price of the new Heygate homes.
When Southwark Council took the decision to push residents off the estate in 2007, it wasn’t just bad news for Heygate residents, it was the first step towards putting any new Heygate homes beyond the reach of most people in London.