Dear Mr Flaherty, > > Could you put this question on my behalf please. > > To Sir Steve Bullock, Mayor of Lewisham > > The Future of Lewisham Hospital > > Please accept my congratulation on the role of the Council in last month's successful legal challenge to the Secretary of State's plans to downgrade Lewisham Hospital's range of services. > > As we are all aware, this was just one of five areas which the TSA, Matthew Kershaw, put forward in his bid to achieve solvency for the indebted Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Woolwich and the Princess Royal University Hospital in Farnborough. > > The TSA recommended that Lewisham and Greenwich merge to become a foundation trust, and promised that the taxpayers would contribute £25.1million a year to help pay the former South London Healthcare Trusts PFI bills. > > Are you able to tell me how much of the £25.1m will be allocated to the QEH and whether it will rise, year on year, as the PFI repayments rise? > > According to the Treasury figures the capital costs of building the QEH were £96.1m. > Total payments due over the 30 years of the contract are a staggering £1033m. > The amount due in this financial year 2013-14 alone is £35m and this rises year on year until a final payment of £61m in the year 2029-30. > > Do you think that healthcare in Lewisham, and in particular the full range of services currently on offer at Lewisham Hospital, will come under renewed threat of cuts and closures in the years to come as a result of the huge payments due to the PFI companies: Barclays, Innisfree and others? > > Will this Council urge both the government and the Labour Party to consider bringing forward legislation to annul this contract which has seen the banks already pocket a profit of 220% on their capital outlay? > > Will you do what you can as an important public office holder to persuade members of your own party such as Ed Milliband and Ed Balls that Gordon Brown's PFI mistakes should be denounced so that the Labour Party can enter the next election with a programme that can restore the NHS to what it was in 1997 rather than one which will continue its dismemberment and privatisation? > > I am attaching the Treasury Committee report into PFI printed on 18th July 2011? The second paragraph of the Summary states: > > /Private finance has always been more expensive than government borrowing, but since the > financial crisis the difference between the costs has widened significantly. The cost of > capital for a typical PFI project is currently over 8%—double the long term government gilt > rate of approximately 4%. The difference in finance costs means that PFI projects are > significantly more expensive to fund over the life of a project. This represents a significant > cost to taxpayers./ > > Thank you, > > John Hamilton >
Community activist, food bank founder-green energy co-op Author * Food Bank Britain *-DEPTFORD radicle history & Liberty , play-book true story Kath Duncan battle 2 establish UK civil. Bio The Last Queen of Scotland Out 2018 .Am guest speaker, social enterprise -poverty-food waste issues . Broadcaster & write The London Economic . My aim giving updates, comments, insight what establishment up 2 across Globe & briefing you on Campaigners MSM chose 2 ignore .
Thursday, 5 September 2013
Lewisham Hospital & PFI the killer Question from John Hamilton People Before Profit Fighting to Oppose ALL NHS privatisation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment