Friday 1 February 2013

Ed Milliband No Back Bone No Ideology No Vision Look at his record so far.

Does Ed Miliband intend - as he and a number of commentators have suggested - to call time on three decades of neoliberalism and establish a new long-term political consensus, as Thatcher and Attlee did before him? In the absence of any firm policy detail, the only way to answer that question is to examine the language Labour has used to critique government policy and set out its own position. Any political paradigm shift requires, in the first instance, for dominant narratives, common assumptions and conventional ways of understanding the issues to be subjected to fundamental challenge. Without first establishing that the old ways of thinking were misconceived, new approaches cannot be brought in to take their place. Yet the evidence so far does not suggest that Miliband's Labour is willing to take even this crucial first step.
Start with Labour's position on the Tory benefits cap. The headline response to the "strivers versus shirkers" theme was that a real terms cut in social security would effectively be a "Strivers Tax" because it hits claimants who are in work. The basic dichotomy - working "strivers" and unemployed "shirkers" - was thereby effectively endorsed. For anyone hoping for the imminent demise of Thatcherism, the sight of a Labour Party unwilling to challenge the neo-Victorian lie that unemployment is caused by wanton idleness, even five years into an economic depression, will have been somewhat less than encouraging.
What of Labour's jobs guarantee for the long-term unemployed? A great idea in principle, except the guarantee does not extend to those jobs being secure, permanent or paid at or above the Living Wage. Miliband's broad diagnosis that, rather than government redistributing to compensate for the iniquities of the market system, the rules of the game themselves should be changed so that wealth is "predistributed" more equally through good and decently paid jobs, is both timely and correct. But fine words are of little practical value when one of Labour's first new jobs policies drives a coach and horses through those basic principles.
Miliband's recent speech on immigration was, superficially, a little more encouraging, reflecting a sense of ease and contentment with the cosmopolitan nation that Britain has become. But substantively, the way he framed the issue simply reflected the real 'political correctness' of the day: Britain has had its problems with racism and xenophobia in the past, but thanks to our heroic national character these have now been overcome, leaving only legitimate concerns about immigration, caused in part by the failure of immigrants themselves to properly integrate with local communities. There was not so much as a suggestion that ignorance and prejudice may play some part in fuelling the hostility faced by this generation of immigrants, as was the case with the last. There was no mention of the relentless xenophobia of the gutter press, no mention of the current threat posed by the "English Defence League", and no mention of continued harassment of black youths by the police, to take some examples. What place will today's victims of bigotry have in the "One Nation" envisaged by a Labour leader so anxious to placate anti-immigrant opinion?
Perhaps the lowest point of Miliband's leadership was his opening of a June 2011 speech with the story of how he had met a man on incapacity benefit who he was "convinced" could find a job, and who was "just not taking responsibility" while "other families on his street are working all hours just to get by." This assessment was offered without evidence, knowledge or medical expertise, mirroring the many prejudicial judgements made against disabled people, especially those with "invisible disabilities", both by their more ill-informed neighbours and by the right-wing press. Make no mistake. This cruel ignorance leads directly to real, physical and emotional suffering. That Miliband chose to pander to that prejudice rather than to defend the maligned and the vulnerable gives us some indication of the character of his leadership.
For the New Labour generation of politicians, intellectual conformity and acceptance of Thatcherite conventional wisdom was seen as the ultimate test of seriousness. But if Miliband really wants to be a transformational leader (of which I am sceptical), then these are precisely the wrong instincts to have. Put simply, if he doesn't have the nerve to pick tough rhetorical fights now, then he has no chance of winning the hard policy battles later on. If anything, the more he accepts the terms of debate as he finds them, the more entrenched the status quo will become.
Is it any Wonder that across the UK, Labour is losing voters on mass. Scotland a former Labour stronghold has seen its voters on mass move to SNP, in Brighten the Greens have replaced Labour, whilst Labour are still reeling from the loss of the safe Labour seat of Bradford to Respect, across the UK, Labour is also under political knock out  from other more local Groups such as no to HS2, Save our NHS,  and in Lewisham the massive rise of People before Profit a sound political movement with a clear economic policy and real vision,following on from the political breakthrough in Ireland when at the first go, People before Profit secured 2 MP seats and a dozen Councillors. Lewisham has 3 Labour seats , a Labour council and a Labour Mayor, all deeply unpopular due to the Last Labour Goverments role in the PFI contract that has seen the Local Hospital face closure, whilst i am Sure they will win loads of Council seats, they are extremly active at grass roots level and have been able to bring all the opposition groups together, the fact that long term Labour MP Joan ruddock has resigned to take up a seat in House of Lords instead of Deptford, could see a real shock and the First People Before Profit MP elected for this seat in 2015.
Keep up to date with comment and events before they are published.follow Ray on twitter @Raywoolford

2 comments:

Nigel Simmons said...

BROKEN BRITAIN UNDER TORIES – GOVERNMENT THE ENEMY WITHIN
What do successive Governments tell us – DO AS I SAY IM A POLITICIAN .
Can anyone recall the last time we had sound Government advice about anything ,they use so called ‘experts’ to back up any claim they want us to believe .These so called experts have some knowledge in their particular field but have sold out their principles for money and power .Any real experts will go against Government because 99% of the time they are selling the Public a duff idea .
Dr David Kelly – no weapons of mass destruction .Professor Harrington – reform Welfare Bill .David Nutt – dismissed Government claims on drugs - they were all on our side but sadly ignored and put on the back burner .What person can send another man to his potential death on Lies and Deceit any Government minister ,our troops are used as the muscle behind any Government agenda not publicly known and yet we and them are told your fighting in Britain’s interests .
Our troops are for our protection not to be used as cannon fodder for some jumped up privileged idiots own agenda .Governments of our time have had their chance and blown it .Its time the public learned to DISREPECT those in power because you are the last of their concerns ,we are used as their given permission to do as they please in a rich man ‘s playground we pay for .
Brtokenbritainundertories.com

Nigel Simmons said...

BROKEN BRITAIN UNDER TORIES – CAMERON/CLEGG – NO CREDIBILITY
I have never seen in my lifetime anyone with such a low credibility rating as you two being quoted on what your proposed plans for more Welfare Cuts will mean beyond 2015 .To steal one of your favourite quotes “the majority of the British Public “ have been educated on how not to Govern a Country ,your incompetence ,draconian ill founded policies and in fighting between the two of you whom gets their way on what have shown us all how to revert back to our childhoods without really trying .
Basically Cameron you are robbing the British Public to enable you to increase Foreign Aid because that will buy you false credibility and standing because you have none here .Even stalwart Conservatives are resigning from the party in droves because of your popularist Gay Marriage Policy .Blairs legacy was being convicted in a court of law in Kuala Lumpur (17-21 Nov 2011) for crimes against humanity along with Bush .Yours will be the Decimation of the whole social structure of British society and your obsession with meaningless political gestures to justify your supposed position as a Leader of this Country .
www.brokenbritainundertories.com